4+@r0U4(NvAESln PKX0id/jza!D4;@Y 4sg1%x:[;C`r$UY[vYyhh6)R4W 4JC%%NY2K. The doctrine is intended to prevent a party from taking advantage of its wrong. "These are some of the dirtiest hands we have seen."California's Second District Court of Appeals wasn't talking about in In re the Marriage of Boswell was not referring to literal dirty hands, but about the family law doctrine of "unclean hands," a principle that in this case cost a divorced spouse more than $92,000 in unpaid child support. The Defendant has the burden to prove that the Plaintiff is not acting in good faith, or that his hands are unclean. When the Bovets moved out, Darcy dropped the eviction lawsuit, then mysteriously the house went up in flames. The clean hands doctrine is a rule of law that someone bringing a lawsuit or motion and asking the court for equitable relief must be innocent of wrongdoing or unfair conduct relating to the subject matter of his/her claim. Unclean hand elements that will be taken into consideration in a case include: If the party in question has engaged in any of these, you may be able to use an unclean hands defense. Samuelson v. Ingraham (1969) 272 Cal.App.2d 804. 610, 637 (Bankry.C.D.Cal. 2nd He filed a complaint to quiet title in his name, though the case eventually was dismissed for failure to appear; The answer to that question is yes, you can. Share it with your network! Brown & Charbonneau, LLP. 2 0 obj ], This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. Fraud. It concluded that Darcy holds good title to the property, and neither of the estates or heirs of Collins and Flowers had any interest in it. Candie does not contest that Robert is Brandie's father; instead, she attempts to place only the burdens of fatherhood on Robert while withholding the benefits. Certain fraudulent activity can also be a factor in awarding child support and the division of property. Nor is that transaction the subject matter of the present case. Clean hands, sometimes called the clean hands doctrine, unclean hands doctrine, or dirty hands doctrine,[1] is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy because the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaintthat is, with "unclean hands". She posits several theories in support of her position. [3] "[N]ot every wrongful act nor even every fraud prevents a suitor in equity from obtaining relief. Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. Robert cited another, later New York case for the opposite [157 Cal. A defense of unclean hands can be used in any legal proceeding, although it is typically used in cases where one party feels they have been wronged and seeks to enforce a contract or seek fair and equitable remedies. [citation needed]. endobj Doctrine of Primary or Exclusive Jurisdiction; Doe Defendant Is Liable; . The legal definition of the clean hands doctrine states that a party seeking to enforce a contract or seeking equitable relief must demonstrate that they are not guilty of any wrongdoing or misconduct. Law360 (March 7, 2019, 1:47 PM EST) --. They will discuss several unclean hands elements to determine if this is the right course of action for your case. The doctrine of unclean hands, often referred to as the dirty hands doctrine or the unclean hand's doctrine, is a legal code that allows a court to refuse to hear a case if the party bringing the case has committed a wrongful act. 163 F.2d at 507. App. Goodenough proves that Hardnose had shown her faked estimates from subcontractors to justify his original bid to Goodenough. Civ. Statute of Limitations for violation of a CC&R provision, architectural guideline, or rule is 5 years from the time the board discovers the violation or, through the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have discovered the violation. Hank Hardnose sues Grace Goodenough for breach of contract for failure to pay the full amount for construction of an addition to her house. Such relief is usually sought in the form of specific performance, or an injunction. The doctrine of after-acquired evidence refers to an employer' s discovery, after an allegedly wrongful termination of employment or refusal to hire, of information that would have justified a lawful termination or refusal to hire. Welfare v. Superior Court (1972) 7 Cal. A complaint against Robert was filed in the Superior Court of Fresno County. She seeks to use this section as an affirmative defense against Robert's motion for visitation and custody. However, our research revealed that to date Popenhager has never been cited by another court for its application of the doctrine. We stand up for your right to fair treatment at work. The court reasoned that the basis of the suit was the result of the father's wrongdoing because the mother was only 14 or 15 years old when she became pregnant. Heres Why. Unlike most legal doctrines, its aim is not to aid the search for truth, or even promote justice for the. Yes, There Is Some Good Debt. The elements of the defense of unclean hands are: (1) Plaintiff is guilty of conduct involving fraud, deceit, unconscionability, or bad faith; (2) This conduct by plaintiff directly relates to the matter at issue; (3) This conduct injured the defendant; and. Your attorney will be able to explain your options and the best course of action for your case. ), Candie also asserts that we must reverse because the trial court exhibited bias against her during an off-record, post hearing motion held in chambers. Unclean Hands Legal Definition The legal term unclean hands refer to a party's inequitable (unfair) conduct related to the matter in litigation. Clean hands, sometimes called the clean hands doctrine, unclean hands doctrine, or dirty hands doctrine, [1] is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy because the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint that Rptr. To establish unclean hands in the United States District Court Northern District of California a defendant must demonstrate: (1) inequitable conduct by the plaintiff; (2) that the plaintiff's conduct directly relates to the claim which it has asserted against the defendant; and (3) plaintiff's conduct injured the defendant. Proc., 475.) Code, 5157.) Want High Quality, Transparent, and Affordable Legal Services? 1 Department of Public Works and Highways vs. Ronald E. Quiwa, doing business under the name "R.E.Q. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb. [1a] Candie argues on appeal that the court erred in granting Robert's motion for visitation. However, judges and lawyers refer to it as the doctrine of unclean hands. But the case fell apart on the grounds of "unclean hands," an allowable defense used to restore equity in cases where the plaintiff may lack a sense of irony. Tue Legal Group offers free initial consultations and advice about your possible employment case. 1971) Appeal, 276, pp. While we have no record before us by which to examine the court's comments, we find the result reached to be the correct one. Therefore, any bias, if indeed any was present, was harmless. If the defendant is simply indicating that the plaintiff is a bad person, then this is not enough to justify the affirmative defense. Our own research has likewise been unfruitful. App. Co. (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 297, 306 ; Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists (1964) 227 Cal.App.2d 675, 726-727 .) 3rd he rented the house to another party, the Bovets. The defendant has the burden of proof to show the plaintiff is not acting in good faith. Can the "doctrine of unclean hands" be used in family court as a way to render a fraudulent back child support judgment as unenforceable in Arizona? 379], the court applied the doctrine partly to resolve an issue involving payment of support arrearages and visitation rights. However, if you feel more comfortable speaking directly to an attorney about the situation, contact our team today for a free consultation. See Munaf v. Geren, 553 U.S. 674, 693 (2008). Planning&ZoningCommis-sion,57Conn.App.797,801,750A.2d507(2000).''When. Rptr. And even where a finding of unclean hands is factually established, a court may still refuse to apply the doctrine if a manifest injustice will result. [2], A defendant's unclean hands can also be claimed and proven by the plaintiff to claim other equitable remedies and to prevent that defendant from asserting equitable affirmative defenses. See Unilogic, Inc. v . A plaintiff's claim to recover under a quantum meruit theory is governed by principles of equity. Although "unclean hands" is often seen as an affirmative defense, it is not, like most affirmative defenses, something that only the . the Unclean Hands Doctrine' in Kaj Hober and others (eds), Between East and W est: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke (Juris Publication 2010) 319: 'Reliance on the maxim ex turpi causa Charles Weiss. If formal discovery has been conducted and you possess the relevant evidence, you may seek a summary judgment by way of a motion. 280 [81 P. San Jose Office. Overall, equitable terms like good faith and conscience are used to determine if the unclean hands doctrine is available. June 13, 1984. In this case, it would not be considered one of the many types of breach of contract that the business could sue you for. 541, 496 P.2d 453]; People v. Johnson (1983) 151 Cal. (Civ. Robert and Candie have never been married or lived together. However, the court found that the unclean hands doctrine is available in legal actions and plaintiff failed to provide "any reason, based on policy or otherwise, for holding that the unclean hands defense is never available in a legal action for conversation." (Unilogic, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp ., supra, 10 Cal.App.4th 612, 620 .) (Marlow v. Wene (1966) 240 Cal. . The unclean hands doctrine typically applies only to equitable claims such as requests for injunctive relief or specific performance, but some jurisdictions permit it as a defense to legal claims as well. Therefore, plaintiffs unrelated corrupt actions and general immoral character would be irrelevant. The doctrine of unclean hands applies when the complaining party shows that the offending party is guilty of immoral, unconscionable conduct and even then only when the conduct relied on is directly related to the subject matter in litigation and the party seeking to invoke the doctrine was injured by such conduct. Rptr. Submit your case to schedule a free consultation. In a recent California 3rd District Court of Appeal decision, it was used against a party who was not following the advice of his attorney when he tried to set aside a forged deed. Generally, it isnt required that the plaintiff engages in the same wrongful conduct as the defendant. Although the unclean hands doctrine is typically an affirmative defense asserted by a defendant, it may also be asserted by a plaintiff in . ?yW Defendant, Robert D., is the father of Brandie W., a minor. Whether youre a California part-time worker or a executive, True Legal Group can help. ), Finally, Candie argues that the court erred in accepting Robert's untimely filed points and authorities. Its provisions were written, in a large part, to further an important state policy which disfavors "child snatching" by parents seeking a more favorable forum. 408.357.8072 Fax. The doctrine of unclean hands, also alternatively known as the "dirty hands doctrine," is an equitable defense in which someone who is being sued by a debt collector argues that a debt collector is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy. See DeBurgh v. The unclean hands doctrine applies to cases where the plaintiff has acted unethically in connection to the circumstances that have led to the suit. An equitable defense of unclean hands can be used to prevent a party from seeking equitable remedies. Has the party in question engaged in any fraudulent act? To prevail, a party must demonstrate that its opponent engaged in inequitable behavior that is related to the subject matter of the litigation. If a person has committed a wrongful act and seeks to use the court to gain an advantage over the other party, the court may refuse to hear the case. What Are Car Title Loans and How Do They Work? The Defendant can argue that the Plaintiff has no grounds to obtain relief because he has acted unethically or in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint. Candie opposed Robert's requests. This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Pon v. Wittman (1905) 147 Cal. It is an affirmative defense that the defendant may claim the plaintiff has "unclean hands". Some examples of remedies include: The requirements for proving unclean hands can vary depending on the state in which the contractual dispute is being heard. Anyone with knowledge of a forged deed should consult with an experienced Sacramento and Placer real estate lawyer. How Long Will It Take for Me to Build Credit? x)*}gZ)EoGPdXnT }GAl]-j nJ 3^8fl^nrt95Q Rj0"W!BMu`7LlkhZE{FJLHF `Gk=7 /b[\bm This motion would be filed as a dismissal motion for failure to prove a necessary element of a claim or after you've proven that you have not engaged in any wrongful conduct. Engaging in a fraudulent act or lying with regard to the contract itself, 3. 3d 1, 19 [112 Cal. (Civ. The Doctrine of Unclean Hands as Guardian of Equity The question posed by the vice chancellor was whether a petitioner could invoke equity to benefit from her own illegal act as a trustee. 19. (Id, at p. In Hines v. Sullivan (1980) 105 Misc.2d 288 [431 N.Y.S.2d 868], the court held that a putative father was precluded from bringing a cause of action under New York law because the "basis of his claim of paternity rest[ed] upon his own wrongdoing." Has the party in question coerced or otherwise forced you into a contract. We are client focused and want to hear your situation in order to provide a compassionate and responsive answer to your situation. The doctrine of unclean hands is "an ancient maxim of equity courts" requiring that "a litigant who seeks to invoke an equitable remedy must have clean hands." Cline v. In other words, the equitable defense of unclean hands is used to prevent a party from using the court system to gain an advantage over the other party in cases involving fraud, misrepresentation, or other wrongful conduct. That [ name of plaintiff] was not compelled by economic pressure to engage in the harmful conduct. What is the Legal Doctrine of Unclean Hands in California? ( Code Civ. (Id, at p. Thereafter, the court found Robert to be Brandie's natural father and ordered Robert to pay support payments. (Womack v. Womack (1966) 242 Cal. 4264-4265.). This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Cartel Asset Mgmt. True Legal Group makes donations to various non-profit groups on a weekly basis. The clean hands doctrine is a rule of law that someone bringing a lawsuit or motion and asking the court for equitable relief must be innocent of wrongdoing or unfair conduct relating to the subject matter of his/her claim. ( Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co. (2014) 59 Cal.4th 407, 428 [173 Cal.Rptr.3d 689, 327 P.3d 797].) In ourHow to Answer a Lawsuitarticle, we discussed how to answer the complaint orlawsuitthat was presented to you. (4) This conduct affected the balance of equities between the litigants in such a way that, in light of plaintiffs conduct, plaintiff should not be permitted any remedy against defendant in equity. You're all set! The "unclean hands" doctrine is a doctrine that prevents one party to a lawsuit from receiving a particular outcome to a case because that party has also engaged in bad behavior. She consented only to full custody on her part and visitation on the condition it could be established that Brandie would not be adversely affected by Robert's visits. A related maxim of jurisprudence is Civil Code section . This legal doctrine can seem complicated, but it is designed to protect the legal system's integrity and prevent a party from using the courts to gain an unfair advantage over another. 354 Pacific . California Court Applies Unclean Hands Doctrine to Bar Wrongful Discharge Claim of Undocumented Worker. See, e.g., Hollander v. Zito, No. Candie misconstrues the application and policy behind the clean hands doctrine in child custody jurisdiction. The clean hands doctrine, also called unclean hands, is a defense to a claim for equitable relief, typically an injunction. http://www.flickr.com/photos/littlejohncollection/4323489252/sizes/m/in/photostream/ The unethical behavior that the plaintiff displayed must be in relation to the complaint itself. If you feel as if you were done wrong by another party and/or have been forced into a contract or agreement that you disagree with, the doctrine of unclean hands could help you protect yourself and your rights. App. And while frequently I have seen courts rightfully, enforce orders, judgments and agreements, I have rarely seen courts cite the doctrine as a basis for the decision, even when I have briefed it. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); 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.